The London Gazette, October 19th 1948 - Supplement

5588 SUPPLEMENT t o the LONDON GAZETTE, 20 OCTOBER, 1948 Chiefs of Staff as to when the attacks were likely to begin were also modified from time to time, as our bombing offensive against the “ski sites ”got underway. 21. In devising measures to deal with pilot­ less aircraft, my staff and I worked inclose touch with General Sir Frederick A. Pile, Bart., G .C.B .S.O.,D .C.,.,M General Officer Com­manding, Anti-Aircraft Command, and his staff, who helped in the preparation of all detailed plans which involved guns and search­lights as well as fighters. 22. It was clear at the outset that to pre­pare a detailed plan of defence would take several weeks. I therefore decided to submit a preliminary outline plan. I took as my point of departure the fundamental proposi­tion that a pilotless aircraft was still an aircraft, and therefore vulnerable to the same basic methods of attack. Of course, as there was no crew, such an aircraft could not be made to crash by killing the pilot on the other hand, it would be incapable of retreat or evasion, except, perhaps, to avery limited extent.* Nevertheless, if the missile should prove in practice as fast as was believed at first, the performance of the fighters on which we nor­mally relied would be inadequate. 23. However, on balance, and considering the uncertainty of our knowledge, it would clearly have been unjustifiable to exclude any of the normal methods of defence which we were accustomed to use against piloted air­craft. Accordingly, I recommended in my out­line plan, which I submitted to the Air Com- mander-in-Chief on the 16th December, that aircraft, guns, searchlights, and balloons all be deployed against pilotless aircraft in such a manner- as to avoid causing mutual inter­ference. I out,pointed however, that the mis­siles might well prove too fast for our fighters, and in any case would make difficult targets for A .A .gunners. I recommended, therefore, that the bombing offensive against the instal­lations in France be continued with the utmost vigour. I also asked to be kept informed of the progress made by two committees which had been setup at the Air Ministry to investi­gate the possibility of radio and electro-mag­netic counter-measures, f 24. During the second half of December General Pile and I completed our detailed plan on these lines. On the 2nd Januaty I sub­mitted the plan to the Air Commander-in-Chief, who approved it and submitted it in turn to higher authority. Meanwhile, the Allied bom­ber offensive against the “ski sites ”was achieving good results and the likelihood of imminent attack seemed to be receding. On 22nd January the Chiefs of Staff came to the conclusion that the date by which we must be ready for attacks by pilotless aircraft to begin could safely be put back until the 1st *At that tim ewe believed that the missile could be made to turn in the air. In point of fact this effect was limited to the first few moments of flight, during which it had to be directed onto its calculated course b any adjustment of the automatic control mechanism made beforehand. t Later it was established that the missiles were not controlled b y radio. T o divert them b y means of an electro-magnetic field was theoretically possible, but would have needed so much copper and electric power that it was quite impracticable. Thus neither investigation produced any positive result. March later they postponed it still further, until the middle of the month. Since intensive preparations for the European operations were due to begin on the 1st April, we were thus faced with the possibility that the first use of pilotless aircraft by the Germans might coin­cide with these preparations or even with the assault itself. 23. Hence, by the time the Chiefs of Staff came to examine the detailed plan it had been overtaken by events. Circumstances now called for a modified plan which would provide simul­taneously for defence against pilotless aircraft and the needs of the offensive. Early in February the Chiefs of Staff asked that such a plan should be prepared. In the meantime, General Pile and I received authority to pro­ceed with the administrative arrangements which would have to be made before any deployment on the lines laid down in the exist­ing plan could be ordered. 26. During the next few weeks, therefore, we overhauled our plan and devised a modified version of it which aimed at meeting the threat from pilotless aircraft mainly with resources not directly required for the European opera­tions. We called this modified version the "Concurrent Air Defence Plan for ‘Overlord ’and 'Diver ’”,or, more briefly, the “‘Over­lord’ DiverT ’Plan”*. I submitted it to the Air Commander-in-Chief towards the end of February. After receiving his approval, it was approved in turn by the Supreme Commander and the Chiefs of Staff. On 4th March I gave instructions for copies of the plan to be sent to the Commands and Groups which would be directly concerned if it were ever put into effect. 27. With minor amendments, this was the plan on which we acted three months later, when the attacks began. Some account of it, and of its relationship to the earlier detailed plan out of which it grew, must therefore be given at this stage. Such an account may pro­vide, perhaps, an insight into the conditions in which a major defensive operation of this kind has to be contrived. For in such cases a Commander must not only take into account a number of factors, political as well as military and logistic, which are governed by the cap­abilities of his own side he must also reckon, first and last and all the time, with what the enemy may have up his sleeve. 28. Both the“ Overlord/Diver ”Plan and the earlier plan were based on the fundamental principles postulated for the first outline plan of the 16th December. But some of the assumptions which had been made when the original outline and detailed plans were made were modified by altered circumstances or fresh intelligence by the time the second plan was made. For example, as I have already out,pointed estimates of the performance of the weapon which we had to counter differed from time to time. Again, as the bombing offensive against the “ski sites ”began to achieve its purpose, the Air Ministry revised their estimates of the probable scale of attack. But the broad con­cepts which determined the general nature of our defensive measures remained substantially unchanged. *"Overlord ”was the code-name for the European operations and “Diver ”that for pilotless aircraft.
Add Names

Disclaimer

We have sought to ensure that the content of this website complies with UK copyright law. Please note however, that we may have been unable to ascertain the rights holders of some items. Where we have digitised items, we have done so with items that to the best of our knowledge, following due investigations, are in the public domain. While the original works are in the public domain we reserve all rights to the usage of the digital works.

The document titled The London Gazette, October 19th 1948 - Supplement is beneath this layer.

To view this document now, please sign up as a full access member.

Free Account Registration

Please enter your first name
Please enter your surname
Please enter a valid email address
Please enter your password
By creating an account you agree to us emailing you with newsletters and discounts, which you can switch off in your account at any time

Already a member? Log in now
Small Medium Large Landscape Portrait